Differential Chemical Constituents in Liangye Roasted Green Teas Made of Different Cultivars

ZHONG Qiu-sheng; SHAN Rui-yang; LIN Wen-ming; LI Xin-lei; LIN Zheng-he; ZHANG Ya-zhen; CHEN Chang-song

doi:10.20045/j.cnki.issn.2096-0220.2023.01.004

ACTA TEA SINICA > 2023 > 64(1): 30-37. > DOI: 10.20045/j.cnki.issn.2096-0220.2023.01.004

ZHONG Qiu-sheng, SHAN Rui-yang, LIN Wen-ming, LI Xin-lei, LIN Zheng-he, ZHANG Ya-zhen, CHEN Chang-song. Differential Chemical Constituents in Liangye Roasted Green Teas Made of Different Cultivars[J]. ACTA TEA SINICA, 2023, 64(1): 30-37. DOI: 10.20045/j.cnki.issn.2096-0220.2023.01.004

Citation:

PDF (561 KB)

Differential Chemical Constituents in Liangye Roasted Green Teas Made of Different Cultivars

1.
Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Fujian Branch of National Center for Tea Improvement, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China
2.
Wuping County Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Wuping, Fujian 364300, China
3.
National Agriculcural Experimental Station for Soil Quality, Fu’an, Fujian 355015, China

More Information

Received Date: September 04, 2022
Revised Date: November 01, 2022
Available Online: March 06, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
Biochemical constituents of varieties of the famed Liangye Roasted Green Tea from Wuping were compared in relation to their sensory quality.
Method
Liangye Roasted Green Teas made by using the leaves plucked from Fuyun 6, Meizhan, Wuniuzao, and Longjing 43 tea bushes were chemically analyzed by UPLC, and the brewed teas evaluated by a sensory panel.
Results
The Wuniuzao tea was rated by the panel with the highest score among all. It was followed by Meizhan and Longjing 43. Biochemical composition analysis found that the content of water extracts was significantly higher in the green tea made by Meizhan than others (P<0.05), and the content of tea polyphenols was significantly higher in the green tea made by Meizhan and Wuniuzao than the other two varieties (P<0.05). While the total amino acid content of Wuniuzao tea was the highest, but the ratios of ester catechin/non-ester catechin and polyphenol/amino acids as well as the index of catechin bitter taste the lowest, of all. On amino acids, the theanine content of 8.971-14.942 mg·g⁻¹ in Fuyun 6 and aspartic acid of 1.854-2.506 mg·g⁻¹ in Wuniuzao were significantly higher than those in the others (P<0.01); and glutamate of 1.690-2.244 mg·g⁻¹ in Meizhan and Wuniuzao significantly higher than that in the other two varieties (P<0.05). The sensory scores on the teas positively correlated with the water extract content (R=0.65) as well as the ratios of polyphenol/amino acids and ester catechin/nonester catechin (P<0.05), but negatively with the index of catechin bitterness index of the various teas.
Conclusion
The sensory evaluation on the brewed teas indicated that Wuniuzao tea bushes yielded the roasted green tea with the most desirable drinking quality among the four tested cultivars.
- Tea cultivars,
- Liangye Roasted Green Tea,
- sensory evaluation,
- catechin,
- theanine

FullText(HTML)

References (20)

References

[1]	刘德发 . 武平绿茶名优品种引种与适制性试验小结[J]. 中国茶叶, 2012（11）: 8-9.
[2]	陈沁灵,曾芳芳. 福建龙岩武平绿茶文化与乡村旅游融合发展研究[J]. 农业经济与科技,2019,30(1):102−104.
[3]	刘德发. 8个新优良种引种及武平绿茶适制性评价[J]. 茶叶科学技术,2012(4):26−28.
[4]	钟德民. 武平绿茶梁野炒绿关键工序温度控制试验总结[J]. 福建茶叶,2011(1):32−34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2291.2011.01.009
[5]	林文明. “梁野翠珠”品质特征及不同茶树品种适制性试验[J]. 基层农技推广,2020,8(2):26−27.
[6]	中华全国供销合作总社. 茶水浸出物测定: GB/T 8305—2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
[7]	中华全国供销合作总社. 茶茶多酚测定: GB/T 8313—2002[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[8]	中华全国供销合作总社. 茶游离氨基酸总量测定: GB/T 8314—2013[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
[9]	吕海鹏,林智,钟秋生,等. 普洱茶E8组分的化学成分研究[J]. 茶叶科学,2010,30(6):423−428. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2010.06.003
[10]	钟秋生,林郑和,陈常颂,等. 烘焙温度对九龙袍品种乌龙茶生化品质的影响[J]. 茶叶科学,2014,34(1):9−20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2014.01.003
[11]	中华全国供销合作总社. 茶叶感官审评方法: GB/T 23776—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
[12]	孙君,朱留刚,林志坤,等. 烘焙工艺对丹桂乌龙茶感官品质及生化成分的影响[J]. 福建农业学报,2016,31(11):1244−1247. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.11.019
[13]	袁争,王烨军,项利民. 国家级茶树良种的烘青及炒青绿茶适制性探讨[J]. 中国农学通报,2016,32(10):182−188. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15100070
[14]	施兆鹏. 茶叶审评与检验[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010.
[15]	刘盼盼,邓余良,尹军峰,等. 绿茶滋味量化及其与化学组分的相关性研究[J]. 中国食品学报,2014,14(12):173−181. doi: 10.16429/j.1009-7848.2014.12.029
[16]	张英娜,嵇伟彬,许勇泉,等. 儿茶素呈味特性及其感官分析方法研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学,2017,37(1):1−9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2017.01.001
[17]	NARUKAWA M, KIMATA H, NOGA C, et al. Taste characterisation of green tea catechins[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2010, 45 (8): 1579−1585.
[18]	马林龙,刘艳丽,曹丹. 不同茶树品种(系)的绿茶滋味分析及评价模型构建[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(10):277−286. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.10.034
[19]	刘爽. 绿茶鲜爽味的化学成分及判别模型研究[D]. 杭州: 中国农业科学院, 2014.
[20]	YU Z, YANG Z. Understanding different regulatory mechanisms of protein aceous and non-protein aceous amino acid formation in tea (Camellia sinensis) provides new insights into the safe and effective alteration of tea flavor and function[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2020, 60 (5): 844−858. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1552245

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (37) PDF downloads (8)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Differential Chemical Constituents in Liangye Roasted Green Teas Made of Different Cultivars

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content